A Safety Overview of SARMs and Related Compounds

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. SARMs are not approved by the FDA for human use and may pose significant health risks. Readers are encouraged to consult healthcare professionals regarding their potential use.


Introduction to SARMs

Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs) are a class of compounds designed to selectively target androgen receptors in muscle and bone tissue [1].

Since their inception, these compounds have garnered attention in the fitness and bodybuilding communities as potential performance enhancers and alternatives to anabolic steroids.

Unlike traditional anabolic steroids, which affect a wide range of tissues and often lead to various side effects, SARMs are intended to promote anabolic effects while minimizing adverse reactions [2,3].

The interest in SARMs has surged in recent years, particularly among athletes and bodybuilders looking for ways to:

  • Enhance their performance
  • Recover faster
  • Build lean muscle without the negative consequences associated with traditional steroids.

However, the long-term effects and full safety profiles of SARMs remain largely unstudied, raising ethical and health questions surrounding their use.

This comprehensive overview aims to explore SARMs in detail, including their:

  • Mechanisms of action
  • Safety concerns
  • Different types available
  • User experiences
  • Potential alternatives

What is the Science Behind SARMs?

The mechanism by which SARMs operate involves selective binding to androgen receptors in specific tissues. When SARMs attach to these receptors, they can influence the anabolic processes of protein synthesis, resulting in:

  • Increased muscle mass
  • Enhanced strength
  • Potentially improved recovery times

The key distinguishing feature of SARMs is their selectivity: they are designed to minimize androgenic activity (effects outside muscle and bone), which is the primary reason traditional anabolic steroids can have broad, harmful impact profiles.

By modulating the androgen receptors selectively, SARMs aim to provide the benefits of anabolic steroids—such as muscle growth and fat loss—while reducing the likelihood of side effects commonly associated with steroids, such as:

  • Androgenetic alopecia [4]
  • Acneiform skin lesions [5]
  • Alterations in mood [6]

However, the reality is much more complex. While some SARM users report successful outcomes with minimal negative effects, others face challenges like hormonal imbalances and other health risks.

Safety and Regulation of SARMs

The safety profile of SARMs is still under investigation. Regrettably, much of the current understanding comes from anecdotal user reports rather than robust clinical studies. Users have reported a range of side effects, including fluctuations in liver enzymes, alterations in blood lipids, and testosterone suppression [7,8,9].

  1. Liver Toxicity: There is an ongoing discussion in the scientific community regarding the hepatotoxicity of SARMs. Liver enzyme levels might rise with certain compounds, indicating potential stress or damage to liver tissues [10]. Monitoring liver function through regular blood tests is prudent for users.
  2. Hormonal Imbalances: Although SARMs are believed to produce fewer androgen-related side effects, some users experience testosterone suppression. This suppression can lead to symptoms such as fatigue, mood swings, and loss of libido. Users often find themselves needing post-cycle therapy (PCT) to restore hormonal balance after discontinuing the use of SARMs.
  3. Cholesterol Levels: Some SARMs have been found to influence lipid profiles, potentially leading to unfavorable changes in cholesterol levels. These changes could contribute to cardiovascular risk, necessitating regular monitoring for users undertaking SARM cycles.
  4. Potential for Dependency: As with many performance-enhancing substances, there is a psychological component that can foster dependency. Users may find themselves reliant on SARMs to achieve desired outcomes, which could have long-term psychological impacts.

Due to their unregulated status, consumers should be cautious when sourcing SARMs. Many products marketed as SARMs may not contain the claimed substances or may include harmful contaminants [11]. Regulatory bodies, including the FDA, have issued warnings concerning the use of SARMs in dietary supplements, emphasizing the need for consumer vigilance [12].

What Are the Safest SARMs?

The following are five SARMs (and related compounds) often regarded as mild, with number one being the least toxic:

  1. Ostarine
  2. Andarine
  3. Stenabolic
  4. Cardarine
  5. Ibutamoren

The last three compounds are not classified as SARMs but are commonly referred to as such within the bodybuilding community.

The sourcing of SARMs is critical, with experts noting that a significant portion of SARMs may be mislabelled or counterfeit. It is advisable to obtain SARMs from reputable suppliers that provide validated certificates of analysis.

Ostarine (MK-2866)

Ostarine is perhaps the most widely researched SARM and is often favored by beginners. It is known for enhancing lean muscle mass and promoting fat loss [13]. Additionally, some users appreciate its gentle approach to performance enhancement, which may lead to fewer side effects. However, liver enzyme elevations and potential cholesterol impacts have been reported [14,15].

Andarine (S4)

Andarine has a reputation for promoting strength and muscle hardness. It may enhance vascularity and body composition, making it appealing for users aiming to achieve a more defined look. However, users may experience vision-related side effects, such as changes in light perception, which can be unsettling.

Stenabolic (SR9009)

While technically not a SARM, Stenabolic is often grouped with them due to its similar effects on muscle performance and fat burning. Its mechanism centers around stimulating the Rev-ErbA protein, which plays a role in the body’s energy distribution and metabolism [16]. Users often report enhanced endurance and fat loss without the same level of side effect risks.

Cardarine (GW501516)

Another compound outside the traditional SARM classification, Cardarine is known for its ability to improve endurance and promote fatty acid oxidation [17]. Like Stenabolic, it is often used to enhance performance, but it is essential to note that some animal studies have raised concerns about its potential carcinogenic effects when used in extremely high doses [18].

Ibutamoren (MK-677)

Ibutamoren is a growth hormone secretagogue rather than a SARM. It stimulates increased levels of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) in the body, leading to enhanced muscle growth and fat loss [19]. Despite being well-tolerated in many users, it can lead to insulin sensitivity changes and potential dependency [20].

What Are the Harshest SARMs?

Some SARMs, such as YK-11, S23, and RAD 150, may be linked to more significant side effects, including testosterone suppression, cardiotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and other adverse effects commonly associated with anabolic steroids.

Assessing the Risks of SARMs: How Can Researchers Reduce Harm?

Given the risks associated with SARMs, it is critical for users to prioritize safety. Before starting the use of any SARM, individuals should consider several factors:

  • Consultation with Healthcare Professionals: Working with healthcare providers who understand the risks of SARMs can help individuals make informed decisions. Medical professionals can assist in monitoring health markers, such as liver function and hormone levels, to mitigate risks.
  • Regular Testing: Users opting to utilize SARMs should consider regular blood testing to evaluate liver enzymes, hormonal levels, and lipid panels. Monitoring health closely can lead to early detection of potential issues.
  • Educating Oneself: Understanding the specific SARM being used, its effects, potential side effects, and suitable dosages can significantly impact user experience. Informed choices can lead to healthier outcomes.
  • Post-Cycle Therapy (PCT): To combat testosterone suppression, users often participate in a post-cycle therapy program after completing a SARM cycle. Ensuring that hormonal levels return to baseline is vital for long-term hormonal health.

What Are Some Potential Stacks?

Stacking involves combining various SARMs or related compounds to amplify their effects. Some users believe that effective stacking can minimize side effects while maximizing results. However, stacking can increase the risk of side effects due to greater hormonal interference.

Some popular combinations include:

  • Ostarine + Cardarine: This stack is popular for those aiming for lean mass gain and fat loss simultaneously. Users often report improved endurance and strength without excessive side effects.
  • Andarine + Stenabolic: This combination is favored for its potential to promote increases in strength and endurance, focusing on cutting cycles. While some users appreciate the results, others report side effects, emphasizing caution.
  • Ibutamoren + Ostarine: Users may seek to enhance muscle recovery and growth with this stack. However, attention to hormonal balance is crucial since both compounds influence hormonal levels.

Combining SARMs can amplify their effects but should always be approached with caution given the increased potential for adverse events.

Are There Alternatives to SARMs?

SARMs alternatives

For individuals concerned about the risks associated with SARMs, several natural alternatives claim to provide similar benefits. These alternatives often use herbal ingredients that may assist with muscle growth, fat loss, and enhanced performance without the adverse side effects associated with synthetic compounds. Some popular alternatives include:

  1. Creatine: A well-researched supplement known for improving strength and power during high-intensity exercise, which also supports muscle growth when used in conjunction with resistance training [21].
  2. Beta-Alanine: Known for endurance performance, beta-alanine can help increase workout capacity and delay fatigue, thus indirectly promoting muscle growth over time [22].
  3. Branched-Chain Amino Acids (BCAAs): These essential amino acids can aid in muscle recovery and support muscle synthesis during resistance exercise [23].
  4. Testosterone Boosters: Many natural supplements claim to boost testosterone levels, often using herbal ingredients like fenugreek, ashwagandha, and ginseng [24,25,26]. However, the efficacy of these supplements can vary widely among individuals.
  5. Protein Supplements: Aiding recovery and muscle growth, protein supplements (like whey or plant-based proteins) contribute significantly to muscle repair when used synergistically with strength training [27].

While these alternatives may not provide the same potent effects as SARMs, they offer safer and more natural ways to support fitness goals, emphasizing the importance of nutrition and exercise.

Reviews: How Do SARMs Affect Users?

Below are some SARM anecdotes sourced from our Facebook group.

Just a heads-up on possible side effects of RAD 140: I have completed a six-week cycle of RAD 140 and did blood tests at the end of week five. Besides T plummeting, my cholesterol is through the roof, almost double what I usually have. I’ve never had issues with cholesterol before and did blood tests also before starting the RAD cycle. My value was so high that the lab doctor wanted to schedule an appointment with a general doctor that day. He said that the recorded value was specific to an imminent heart attack. Also, my blood pressure spiked as well, although I am not sure if it is related to the cholesterol value. Obviously we all react differently to it, but I thought maybe it was a good idea to have also the cholesterol checked after RAD 140.


My favorite SARM is YK-11, besides RAD 140. I had awesome strength gains and fast. 10 mg of YK-11 with 20 mg of RAD 140 a day is the best stack out there, in my opinion. I discontinue YK-11 at week 6 and run RAD 140 for 10 weeks total. Huge difference in effects than just RAD 140 alone. No noticeable side effects.


YK and I have a love/hate relationship. I love the way it builds muscle and fullness. But I hated the way it dried my joints out. I felt like a 70-year-old man around weeks 6–7.


YK-11 and S23 send me round the twist. Not in a good way either. Personal experience, of course!


Conclusion

In the ongoing quest for improved physical performance and aesthetic enhancement, SARMs have emerged as a prominent subject of interest. With promises of significant muscle growth, fat loss, and enhanced recovery, these compounds attract users who are often uninformed about their potential risks. While SARMs present the allure of reduced side effects compared to anabolic steroids, they are not without their challenges.

It is critical for individuals to take a responsible approach when considering SARMs, prioritizing safety through consultation with healthcare providers and ongoing monitoring of health markers. The vast array of available SARMs and related compounds can be enticing, but education, caution, and personal responsibility are paramount.

Furthermore, for those hesitant about using SARMs, numerous natural alternatives exist that can help support fitness goals without the risks associated with synthetic substances. In the end, a well-rounded approach based on proper nutrition, consistent exercise, and safe supplementation will yield the best long-term results.

As the scientific investigation surrounding SARMs continues, more information will likely emerge, helping to clarify their potential benefits and risks. Until then, informed decision-making and a thorough understanding of these compounds remain essential for those who choose to explore this frontier in performance enhancement.

Co Authors :

  • A male recorded 346 U/L alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and 110 U/L aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels following Ostarine use (28).
  • A YK-11 dose of 0.35 g/kg led to mitochondrial dysfunction and may worsen neurological health in users (29).
  • Cardarine exhibited antiproliferative effects in rats following 15 days of treatment (30).
  • Cardarine has anti-inflammatory effects on cancer cells following 20–50 nanograms of administration (31).
  • Oral SARMs worsened hepatic triacylglycerol lipase levels following 12 weeks of treatment (32).
  • SARMs increased lean body mass by 8% in monkeys (33).
  • Over 90% of males acquire SARMs from the Internet without any medical supervision (34).
  • 20 cases of SARM-induced adverse effects have been reported since 2020 (35).
  • One study found only 41% of SARM products have the correct dose, as specified on the label (36).

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2907129/
  2. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S027323001000019X
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7108998/
  4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK278957/
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7951664/
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4979577/
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10024817/
  8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9271272/
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4111291/
  10. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.17906
  11. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2664459
  12. https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/fda-warns-use-selective-androgen-receptor-modulators-sarms-among-teens-young-adults
  13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23499390/
  14. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34368386/
  15. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37865959/
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8955992/
  17. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17869249/
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6475847/
  19. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9467542/
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9331610/
  21. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37432300/
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3257613/
  23. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16365096/
  24. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32048383/
  25. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35873404/
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3861174/
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5667622/
  28. https://www.journalmc.org/index.php/JMC/article/view/3937/3281
  29. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37468001/
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6031703/
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5614479/
  32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9271272/
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7005530/
  34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34471228/
  35. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00228-023-03592-3
  36. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2664459